|

|
The Apostle Paul's Epistle
to the Galatians |
|
Chapter 4
|
|
1Now
I say, as long as the heir is a child, he does not differ at all
from a slave although he is owner of everything, 2but he is under
guardians and managers until the date set by the father.
Paul now moved on to an example from Roman culture to further
illustrate what he was previously explaining. Apparently, even
legitimate Roman sons didn't have access to their inheritance, until
the arrival of a date set by their father. Paul made this point to
show the equality of Jews and Gentiles. In one sense, because they
are naturally connected to the Torah by their upbringing, Jews could
already be considered "children of God," but this does not
automatically mean they have a claim on the inheritance or promises
of the Abrahamic covenant; this is especially true on an eternal
level. Both Jews and Gentiles are descendants of Adam; therefore,
Jews are no different than Gentiles (or "slaves") with no natural
connection to the Torah, because we are all made equal by a sinful
nature.
3So
also we, while we were children, were held in bondage under the
elemental things of the world.
Notice Paul used the word "we," which means Jewish people are
included. "Elemental things of world" refers to sin in general. His
point was that whether you have a natural, a legal, or no connection
to the Torah at all, we are all under the bondage of sin before we
come to faith. (This parallels his teachings in Romans chapter 2,
specifically verse 12.)
4But
when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of
a woman, born under the Torah,
The phrase "fullness of the time" can be interpreted to mean "the
specific time appointed by God." Let's think about this for a
moment: why did God send Yeshua in the first century? Is it possible
that first century Israel contained the perfect religious expression
for Yeshua to be a part of? In other words, the Temple service, the
liturgy, the way the Sabbath was kept, the Holidays, and the rest of
the Jewish culture was the appropriate expression of faith to be
lived out by our Master Himself. It's true that some were not
adhering to the ideals of this expression with a pure heart, but we
know that the Master was faithful in His expression, and He is our
primary example. This is a fact worthy of serious consideration.
To clarify any
assumption that the Messiah was a supernatural being, Paul indicated
that God's Son was born of a woman. Rather than thinking that the
Messiah was above humanit y,
Paul emphasized that he was born of a woman, just as we all were.
The writer to the Hebrews similarly said: "[He was]
tempted in
all things as we are, yet without sin" (Hebrews 4:15).
He went on to say that he was born
"under the Torah." What does it mean to be "under the Torah?" The
context of Romans 6:14-15 indicates that being “under Torah”
means you are under the condemnation of the Torah. Additionally, in
1 Corinthians 9:20-21, Paul labeled those who rely on legal
Jewish status for salvation as those who are “under Torah.” Just
like the term "flesh" has many connotations but ultimately refers to
the sinful nature, so too this phrase has different connotations but
always ultimately refers to being "under the condemnation of the
Torah.” How was Yeshua born "under the condemnation of the Torah"
then, since He never sinned? Paul was not stating that Yeshua was a
sinner; rather, he was referring to the fact that the Master was
subject to a fallen human nature (in a physical sense) and would one
day take upon himself the condemnation of the Torah.
To be clear, the Master did not sin but physically speaking he
experienced life as a human being in the same way all since Adam
have.
5so
that He might redeem those who were under the Torah, that we might
receive the adoption as sons.
The Master voluntarily took upon Himself the condemnation of the
Torah, to redeem the rest of us, those who are actually under the condemnation
of the Torah via our violation of Torah. This was done so that we can be adopted children.
As the only begotten of the Father, Yeshua is the only true Son and
heir. The rest of us, Jews and Gentiles, are
adopted.
6Because you are sons, God has sent forth the Spirit of His Son into
our hearts, crying, "Abba! Father!" 7Therefore you are no longer a
slave, but a son; and if a son, then an heir through God.
Paul could be saying "the proof that you are children of God is
that, through the Spirit, you have a desire for God." In other
words, by the Spirit, we experience that deep connection to God,
like a child would to his father. "Abba" is the Aramaic way of
saying "father," and conveys more of an intimate sense (similar to
the English word "dad" being a little more intimate than the word
"father").
8However at that time, when you did not know God, you were slaves to
those which by nature are no gods. 9But now that you have come to
know God, or rather to be known by God, how is it that you turn back
again to the weak and worthless elemental things, to which you
desire to be enslaved all over again? 10You observe days and months
and seasons and years. 11I fear for you, that perhaps I have labored
over you in vain.
Paul now reminded the Gentile Believers of the time before they
came to faith, when they worshipped idols. He did this to once again
remind them of the positive changes they experienced in their lives.
Apparently, the Gentile Believers were returning to pagan practices,
specifically related to pagan holidays. Paul feared that he had
taught them in vain. This is ironic language, because Paul clearly
didn't think that the Gentiles who were genuinely changed by the
Spirit could go back to their pagan life in any sort of permanent
way (as is attested by his other epistles). The Gentile Believers
were facing persecution because they were not submitting to the
teaching of the Influencers. Apparently, being shut out from the
Jewish community motivated some to return to their pagan
communities, and even to participate in the pagan festivals.
12I
beg of you, brethren, become as I am, for I also have become as you
are. You have done me no wrong;
Paul was now, perhaps, trying to soften the tone of his letter. His
plea was for them to return to their previous position as redeemed
Gentiles, continuing to learn the ways of God. In other words, he
was asking them to return to what he had taught them. In his
presentation of the Good News, Paul made it clear that Jews and
Gentiles are on the same level. Why would the Gentile Believers now
accept a message that put a distinction between them?
|
|
|
|
13but
you know that it was because of a bodily illness that I preached the
gospel to you the first time; 14and that which was a trial to you in
my bodily condition you did not despise or loathe, but you received
me as an angel of God, as Messiah Yeshua Himself. 15Where then is
that sense of blessing you had? For I bear you witness that, if
possible, you would have plucked out your eyes and given them to me.
16So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?
Here, Paul simply spoke of their initial meeting and how he
proclaimed the Good News to them; he was reminding them of how they
treated him and how they were blessed for it. He reiterated these
things to show that he shouldn't be regarded as their enemy, because
he was just trying to tell them the truth.
17They eagerly seek you, not commendably, but they wish to shut you
out so that you will seek them.
From Paul's perspective, the Influencers didn't actually care about
the Gentile Believers in a genuine way; they just wanted to maintain
their superiority. As long as the Gentile Believers continued to
disregard the message of the Influencers, they would be shut out
from the larger community. How that was accomplished, we aren't
told.
18But
it is good always to be eagerly sought in a commendable manner, and
not only when I am present with you. 19My children, with whom I am
again in labor until the Messiah is formed in you-- 20but I could
wish to be present with you now and to change my tone, for I am
perplexed about you.
Paul was genuinely concerned with the Gentile Believers of Galatia.
He broke from his strong and ironic language of the previous
chapters, and showed his concern for them as clearly as possible.
21Tell me, you who want to be under Torah, do you not listen to the
Torah?
Paul again used the phrase "under Torah," which has several
connotations but always ultimately refers to being under the
condemnation of the Torah. In this case, I believe it refers to
wanting to gain a legal connection to the Torah by becoming a
proselyte. Such an action would put that individual under the
Torah’s condemnation, because they would be ignoring the Torah’s way
of salvation (faith). To those who wanted to become proselytes, Paul
admonished them to listen and obey what the Torah actually says.
22For
it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the bondwoman and
one by the free woman. 23But the son by the bondwoman was born
according to the flesh, and the son by the free woman through the
promise. 24This is allegorically speaking, for these women are two
covenants: one proceeding from Mount Sinai bearing children who are
to be slaves; she is Hagar.
Paul clearly told us he was speaking allegorically of the story of
Hagar and Sarah and their respective sons. Ishmael was born
according to human decision, or "according to the flesh." Isaac was
born by God's sovereign will, or "through the promise," because
Sarah was barren and conceived only because God promised that she
would. In the context of the epistle, those "according to the flesh"
are the Influencers and any who chose to become proselytes to gain
right-standing before God. Those "through the promise" are those who
rely on Messiah's work for salvation. I believe he was contrasting
the Mosaic covenant and the New Covenant. By itself, the Mosaic
covenant only results in condemnation, while the New Covenant
promises a change of heart and forgiveness of sins. To put it
another way, the Mosaic covenant doesn’t affect a change of heart,
it’s just the black and white words of the Torah. The New Covenant,
on the other hand, promises that the Torah will be written on your
heart; accomplished by the work of the Spirit. This is similar to
his explanation in 2 Corinthians 3, which says that without
the work of the Spirit, the Torah only results in condemnation.
25Now
this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present
Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children. 26But the
Jerusalem above is free; she is our mother. 27For it is written,
"REJOICE, BARREN WOMAN WHO DOES NOT BEAR; BREAK FORTH AND SHOUT, YOU
WHO ARE NOT IN LABOR; FOR MORE NUMEROUS ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE
DESOLATE THAN OF THE ONE WHO HAS A HUSBAND."
Paul's point in this allegory was this: those who think that a
legitimate place in Israel is secured by becoming a proselyte are
compared to Hagar, whose son with Abraham was born because of a
human decision. Paul mentioned Mount Sinai, and in doing so was
reminding the Galatians of the rebellion that occurred there. In
other words, as stated above, being connected to the Mosaic covenant
without first identifying with the Abrahamic covenant by faith only
results in condemnation. The rebellion at Mount Sinai proved that
simply being a part of the visible people of God wasn’t enough to
gain right-standing.
28And
you brethren, like Isaac, are children of promise. 29But as at that
time he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him who was
born according to the Spirit, so it is now also.
True believers are like Isaac, in that they are God's chosen people
of promise. Both Ishmael and Isaac were sons of Abraham, but only
Isaac was chosen for blessing. Paul's point was that it doesn't
matter whether you're a natural or legal son of Abraham, because
being a part of the elect of Israel depends only upon God's
sovereign choice, regardless of legal status. Additionally, he
sought to comfort the Believers by stating that the persecution they
were experiencing was also experienced by Isaac.
30But
what does the Scripture say? "CAST OUT THE BONDWOMAN AND HER SON,
FOR THE SON OF THE BONDWOMAN SHALL NOT BE AN HEIR WITH THE SON OF
THE FREE WOMAN." 31So then, brethren, we are not children of a
bondwoman, but of the free woman.
Paul quoted the Tanakh to emphasize that the Influencers should be
neither listened to nor obeyed. He capped his point by reiterating
that we are not children of "Hagar" but of "Sarah." In other words,
the Gentile Believers should remember that they know the truth and
don't need to adhere to the teaching of the Influencers. |
|