|

|
The Epistle to the Hebrews |
|
Introduction
|
|
This Age and the Age to Come
For He did not subject to angels the World to
Come, concerning which we are speaking. (Hebrews
2:5)
In traditional Jewish thought, there are only
two dispensations of time that God has mapped
out for humanity: this age and the age to come.
The writer to the Hebrews community had the age
to come in view when writing this epistle. Of
course, the epistle to the Hebrews has much to
say about this age as well but his point was
that what he was writing about taught us about
the age to come in contrast to the current
system of this age.
In traditional Jewish eschatology, the advent of
the Messiah will initiate the age to come.
According to the prophets, the Messiah will
come, gather the people of Israel back to the
Land of Israel and peace will sweep the entire
world. From an Apostolic perspective,
apparently, previous to the age to come, which
refers to the promised new heaven and new earth,
there will be a thousand-year reign of the
Messiah in which all of the covenant-promises
made by God to Israel will be fulfilled. In that
time, believers from all eras will be granted
resurrection and immortality. It is with these
things in mind, the future reign of the Messiah
and the age to come, as we study the epistle to
the Hebrews. Too often Christians think that the
new age began when Jesus died and rose two
thousand years ago. While we should certainly
affirm that in that great event the "future had
invaded the present," it would be detrimental to
our interpretation of the Scriptures and the
epistle to the Hebrews in particular if we
thought that the new age has already come.
The Historical Context of the Epistle
The epistle to the Hebrews community, like the
epistle to the Galatians, has historically been
interpreted with a faulty hermeneutic. The fault
comes from not properly understanding the
context of the situations facing the first
century believing communities. It is widely and
incorrectly assumed that the Apostles and the
associates of the Apostles taught against
followers of Yeshua continuing to observe the
commandments of the Torah. Specifically, it's
assumed that the writer to the Hebrews community
was contrasting the new grace-based religion of
Christianity as over against the old works-based
religion of Judaism. This dispensational
paradigm, however, denies that Yeshua has always
been God's way of salvation. The Torah was not
kept by the faithful of the Tanakh and of the
Gospels to earn their salvation. Rather, the
Torah was kept because God commanded it be kept
and as His redeemed people they obeyed Him in
love. The same remained true into the Apostolic
period, throughout history and remains to this
day.
That being said, why, then, was the epistle to
the Hebrews community written? Who wrote the
epistle and which community was the Hebrews
community? It would appear that the epistle was
written from Italy by someone who was an
associate of Timothy, who himself was an
associate of the Apostle Paul. It says at the
end of the epistle:
Take notice that our brother Timothy has been
released, with whom, if he comes soon, I will
see you. Greet all of your leaders and all the
saints. Those from Italy greet you. (Hebrews
13:23-24)
Though we can't be dogmatic, it would appear
that this epistle was written between 64 and 67
AD. According to tradition, the Apostle Paul was
beheaded in Rome by order of the emperor Nero in
64 AD. It's possible that Timothy was also
imprisoned in Rome at this time. Additionally,
the epistle makes no mention of the Jewish
revolt that began in 67 AD nor of the Temple's
destruction, which happened in 70 AD. This, as
mentioned, would place the writing of this
epistle in the mid-60s of the first century AD.
The question of who authored the epistle has
been debated for hundreds of years. The most
popular opinion is that it was written by the
Apostle Paul. There are some early traditions
that say it was written by Paul's associate
Barnabas. Again, we cannot be dogmatic about it
but it's my contention that this epistle was
written by an associate of Paul, possibly even
with the assistance of the Apostle himself. It's
very much a possibility that the epistle was
written and structured by Luke, with the
theology originating from Paul or a close
associate of Paul.
It would appear that the epistle was written to
a community that was labeled "the Hebrews."
While the epistle itself does not contain this
designation, some early manuscripts do contain
the title "to the Hebrews." Who were the
Hebrews? The Hebrews most likely refers the
group of believing Jews who maintained their
distinct Jewish identity by speaking Hebrew and
leading a traditional Jewish life. This is
contrasted with Hellenistic Jews, who were Jews
who spoke Greek and were open to Greek ideas. We
see this contrast in the book of Acts:
And in these days, the disciples multiplying,
there came a murmuring of the Hellenists at
the Hebrews, because their widows were being
overlooked in the daily ministration, (Acts 6:1)
|
|
|
|
The Hebrews community, the community to which
this epistle was sent, could very well have been
the Jerusalem community of believers. This would
be the Jerusalem assembly of which James, Jesus'
brother, was leader of. The internal evidence
within the epistle would indicate that the
believers no longer had access to the Temple.
The Temple had been the place of assembly for
the believers of Jerusalem. According to the
book of Acts, it was the disciples' custom to
meet in the Temple daily and to participate in
the Temple services:
Day by day continuing with one mind in the
temple, and breaking bread from house to house,
they were taking their meals together with
gladness and sincerity of heart, (Acts 2:46)
Now Peter and John were going up to the temple
at the ninth hour, the hour of prayer. (Acts
3:1)
And every day, in the temple and from house to
house, they kept right on teaching and preaching
Yeshua as the Messiah. (Acts 5:42)
Apparently, at some point, the disciples were
ex-communicated from the Temple assembly, just
as Jesus had prophesied:
They will make you outcasts from the
[assembly], but an hour is coming for everyone
who kills you to think that he is offering
service to God. (John 16:2)
The writer to the Hebrews sought to comfort and
encourage the believers. With the Temple and the
Temple service being such an integral part of
the Jerusalem believers' lives, the disciples
were in need of answers to their many questions.
Without access to the Temple, the believers
could not participate in the sacrificial service
clearly outlined in the Torah. The believers
were, for all practical purposes, in exile. How
were the believers to worship God? How were they
to bring sacrifices? The writer to the Hebrews
sought to answer all of these questions and
more.
The Perpetuity of the Aaronic Priesthood
You shall gird them with sashes, Aaron and
his sons, and bind caps on them, and they shall
have the priesthood by a perpetual statute. So
you shall ordain Aaron and his sons. (Exodus
29:9)
The Torah says, here in Exodus, that the
priesthood belongs to Aaron and his sons by a
"perpetual statute." The phrase "perpetual
statute" in Hebrew is "chukat olam." This
phrase, chukat olam, describes something
that can never be overturned or reversed. There
will never be a time in this age that the
priesthood does not belong to Aaron and his
sons. This is further confirmed in Numbers:
Then the LORD spoke to Moses, saying, "Phinehas
the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest,
has turned away My wrath from the sons of Israel
in that he was jealous with My jealousy among
them, so that I did not destroy the sons of
Israel in My jealousy. Therefore say, 'Behold, I
give him My covenant of peace; and it shall be
for him and his descendants after him, a
covenant of a perpetual priesthood, because he
was jealous for his God and made atonement for
the sons of Israel.'" (Numbers 25:10-12)
God additionally confirmed that the priesthood
belongs to Aaron and his sons forever by making
a covenant with Phinehas (Aaron's grandson),
promising his descendants the priesthood
forever. It certainly appears that as long as we
are in this age, the priesthood belongs to the
house of Aaron. Amazingly, generally speaking,
descendants of Aaron have maintained their
lineage and there remain identifiable sons of
Aaron to this day. If a Temple were to be
rebuilt, there would certainly be sons of Aaron
reporting for duty.
The Contradiction of a Second Priesthood
The Torah is clear: the priesthood belongs to
the order of Aaron but Psalm 110 presents a
seeming contradiction:
The LORD has sworn and will not change His
mind, "You are a priest forever according to the
order of Melchizedek." (Psalm 110:4)
Here, the LORD is speaking to the Messiah and
promises Him a priesthood not according to Aaron
but according to Melchizedek. How can there be a
Melchizedekian priesthood if God promised the
priesthood to the house of Aaron? Furthermore,
the writer to the Hebrews states:
For when the priesthood is changed, of
necessity there takes place a change of law
also. (Hebrews 7:12)
How is it that the priesthood could change? Even
worse, how can the Torah change? Granted, from
the traditional Christian perspective, the Torah
changing is no big deal but from the
Torah-based, Messianic perspective, this is a
serious and problematic claim. According to the
Torah, no one is to add or take away from the
Torah (Deuteronomy 4:2) and Jesus himself says
in Matthew 5:18 that not one letter will pass
from the Torah until heaven and earth pass away.
Is it possible that God has reversed His
covenant promise to Aaron and Phinehas that they
would have the priesthood forever and has
instead established the Messiah's Melchizedekian
priesthood? As we study through chapters 7-10 of
Hebrews, let's see if the writer to the Hebrews
can resolve this seeming contradiction for us.
|
|